CPU Performance: Rendering Tests

Rendering is often a key target for processor workloads, lending itself to a professional environment. It comes in different formats as well, from 3D rendering through rasterization, such as games, or by ray tracing, and invokes the ability of the software to manage meshes, textures, collisions, aliasing, physics (in animations), and discarding unnecessary work. Most renderers offer CPU code paths, while a few use GPUs and select environments use FPGAs or dedicated ASICs. For big studios however, CPUs are still the hardware of choice.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Blender 2.79b: 3D Creation Suite

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Blender can be downloaded at https://www.blender.org/download/

Blender 2.79b bmw27_cpu Benchmark

Blender can take advantage of more cores, and whule the frequency of the 9990XE helps compared to the 7940X, it isn't enough to overtake 18-core hardware.

LuxMark v3.1: LuxRender via Different Code Paths

As stated at the top, there are many different ways to process rendering data: CPU, GPU, Accelerator, and others. On top of that, there are many frameworks and APIs in which to program, depending on how the software will be used. LuxMark, a benchmark developed using the LuxRender engine, offers several different scenes and APIs.


Taken from the Linux Version of LuxMark

In our test, we run the simple ‘Ball’ scene on both the C++ and OpenCL code paths, but in CPU mode. This scene starts with a rough render and slowly improves the quality over two minutes, giving a final result in what is essentially an average ‘kilorays per second’.

LuxMark v3.1 C++

We see a slight regression in performance here compared to the 7940X, which is interesting. I wonder if that 2.4 GHz fixed mesh is a limiting factor.

POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing

The Persistence of Vision ray tracing engine is another well-known benchmarking tool, which was in a state of relative hibernation until AMD released its Zen processors, to which suddenly both Intel and AMD were submitting code to the main branch of the open source project. For our test, we use the built-in benchmark for all-cores, called from the command line.

POV-Ray can be downloaded from http://www.povray.org/

POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Core i9-9990XE: The Compilation Champion CPU Performance: Encoding Tests
Comments Locked

145 Comments

View All Comments

  • phexac - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - link

    “That's just a bunch of hogwash. You couldn't dig a straight line from Chicago to Jersey. It's just fancy sounding hogwash meant to convince those without the logic or background to see it for the hogwash it is. It's no more true than grimm's fairy tales.“

    I love how the less a particular poster knows about this issue, the angrier they get and the more certain they sound about the nonsense they spout.
  • Slash3 - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    The secret DIMMs look like the same Samsung B-die based G.Skill ARES used in their 9900K blade.

    https://www.servethehome.com/icc-vega-r-116i-revie...
  • colonelclaw - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    I dunno, it may be absolutely terrible value for money, and not even obtainable by pretty much the entire world's population, but I do like it when a tech company does something because they can, not because they should. It's this sort of attitude that keeps us all evolving.
  • nathanddrews - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    At the end of the day, life is all about bragging rights. I'd never buy this, but I'd love to have it!
  • mooninite - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    Why would you love to have it? Just because it is an Intel CPU? The same company that has *hardware* security vulnerabilities? A much cheaper Ryzen system is shown to be just as fast as this product...
  • Retycint - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    It's really amusing to see how some people get so triggered over the mere mention of Intel
  • GreenReaper - Tuesday, October 29, 2019 - link

    It's shocking to see support for Intel, even though their name is a shorthand for the intelligence agencies!
  • Retycint - Tuesday, October 29, 2019 - link

    It's also very amusing to see you immediately assume I'm an Intel supporter
  • 29a - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    That's a strange take on life.
  • colonelclaw - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    Exactly! It's just a bit of fun. As a product, it would be useless for my day job, but an absolute hoot in my gaming pc back at home. Who cares that it's pointless, and overpriced by a factor of five? I'm never going to buy it, and neither is anybody else here.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now