Intel Hires Fab Veteran, Former GlobalFoundries CTO Dr. Gary Pattonby Anton Shilov on December 11, 2019 6:00 PM EST
- Posted in
Intel has hired Dr. Gary Patton, the former CTO at GlobalFoundries and an ex-head of IBM Microelectronics business. Dr Patton was leading Global Foundries leading edge processes before that project was cancelled. At Intel, Dr. Patton will be responsible for design enablement, a crucial connection between process technology, yields, performance, and time-to-market of actual products.
Gary Patton most recently served as the CTO of GlobalFoundries, where he was responsible for R&D and strategic decisions associated with upcoming process technologies. He joined GlobalFoundries from IBM Microelectronics in 2015, when GF took over IBM's fabrication technologies. At IBM, he had the same role and was responsible for research and development of new semiconductor process technologies.
GlobalFoundries, as a function of spending its 14/12nm profits into its 7nm development and one of its major shareholders wanting to recoup investment in the company, last year decided to cease development of leading-edge fabrication technologies. The company ended up focusing on its profitable 14/12nm processes and working on specialized manufacturing processes, such as 22FDX and 12FDX, to avoid direct competition from TSMC and Samsung Foundry. The new focus of the company to a large degree changed the role of the CTO and other executives, and over time we have seen an exodus of personnel who have traditionally been on the leading edge.
A Future at Intel: Helping Fix The Process Flow
At Intel, Gary Patton will serve as corporate vice president and general manager of design enablement reporting to Mike Mayberry, CTO of Intel. As the head of design enablement, Dr. Patton will be responsible for creation of an ecosystem that supports implementation of products using a particular process technology. Among other things, he will lead development of process design kits (PDKs), IP, and tools. The right combination of PDK, IP, tools, and other enablers ensure that the final product meets cost, performance and time-to-market requirements.
Gary Patton will be another high-ranking executive at Intel that comes from outside of the company. In the recent years Intel hired Jim Keller to develop CPU microarchitectures and Raja Koduri to lead development of discrete GPUs for PCs, datacenters, and other applications. No only this, but Dr. Murthy Renduchintala moved from Qualcomm to Intel as its chief engineering officer in recent years.
At this time Intel has not formally made a statement as to their new hire. Dr. Patton's pages at GlobalFoundries have been removed.
We interviewed Dr. Patton at GlobalFoundries when we visited the Malta fab in 2018. You can read that interview here:
- GlobalFoundries Stops All 7nm Development: Opts To Focus on Specialized Processes
- GlobalFoundries and Chinese Authorities Reconsider Plans
- GlobalFoundries Mulls IPO Plans for 2022
- Marvell to Acquire Avera Semiconductor from GlobalFoundries
- GlobalFoundries to Sell 300mm New York Fab to ON Semiconductor
- GlobalFoundries to Sell 200-mm Fab 3E to Vanguard, Exits MEMS Business
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
garyisgod - Tuesday, December 17, 2019 - link@IanCutress I do respect you and what you do but based on what you mention here is just pathetic a$$ k!$$!ng. This guy here only wants to blow his own horn (e.g., write and edit his own Wikipedia page, right now posting his web coverage on his LinkedIn page). This is a guy who strives to toot his accomplishments which is mainly achieved by who knows who. Let me highlight his successes to you
1) IBM struggled with 32nm yield transfers it to GF which a decade ago starts yielding better than IBM
2) IBM struggled with 20nm which later got transferred to GF, it failed
3) IBM struggled with 14nm and were the only ones with SOI platform, thankfully for Sanjay 14nm was transferred from Samsung which helped GF.
4) This guy comes down to GF decides to do 10nm based on 14nm, then decides to do 7nm and the rest is history.
He has been a complete failure at IBM and GF other than the fact that he shows successes with the failures. Starting 2008 till now he has not helped either IBM or GF develop a profitable technology.
Thanks to his position he probably got an umbrella package and a so-called retirement from GF. I do wish it would have been not the case.
A classic example of fake it till you make it and the sad reality