Razer this week introduced an upgraded version of its latest Blade laptop that is now powered by Intel’s quad-core Kaby Lake processor along with DDR4-2400 memory and has 4K display and 1 TB SSD options. The 14” gaming notebook uses the same 17.8 mm-thick chassis introduced last year and has the same I/O capabilities, but some minor differences in weight. Meanwhile, it is important to note that the entry-level Razer Blade now costs $100 less than it used to last year, but at the expense of a lower-resolution display.

The new Razer Blade is based on the Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4C/8T, 2.8/3.8 GHz, 6 MB, 45 W) processor as well as the HM175 PCH (so, the same motherboard as before). The new chip is powered by the Kaby Lake microarchitecture, has higher frequencies compared to its predecessor that was used in last year’s Blades (Core i7-6700HQ) and supports Speed Shift v2 technology as well as other improvements. Along with the Kaby Lake CPU, the new Blade also got 16 GB of faster DDR4-2400 memory (soldered to the mainboard). In addition to 256 GB and 512 GB M.2 (NVMe/PCIe) SSDs, Razer now also offers a 1 TB PCIe drive as an option. When it comes to graphics, the new Blade uses NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1060 with 6 GB of GDDR5 memory and an HDMI 2.0b output, just like the predecessor introduced last fall.

Apart from the CPU and DRAM upgrades, Razer changed display options for the latest breed of Blade laptops. Last year the company only offered its Blades with touch-enabled IGZO LCDs featuring 3200×1800 resolution, and a matte 1920x1080 on the entry level. This year the higher-end Blade machines will feature touch-enabled UHD displays (3840×2160). Usage of the lower-resolution panel allowed Razer to reduce the price of the entry-level Blade to $1899 (or by $100), but at present we do not know how much the 4K SKUs is going to cost. In any case, systems featuring FHD panels will be slightly lighter and will have a longer battery life than models with UHD monitors. We haven't heard back from Razer on if the new UHD display continues to be a Sharp IGZO panel or not. Apart from displays, different Blade systems will look and feel exactly the same: both use a solid CNC-milled aluminum chassis with a matte black finish.

Razer Blade Comparison
  2017 Razer Blade FHD 2017 Razer Blade UHD Late 2016 Razer Blade
CPU Intel Core i7-7700HQ
2.8 GHz/3.8 GHz
6 MB
45 W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2.6/3.5 GHz
6 MB
Memory 16 GB DDR4-2400 16 GB DDR4-2133
Display 1920×1080 matte 3840×2160 touch 3200×1800 IGZO touch
Storage 256/512/1024 GB PCIe M.2 256/512 GB PCIe M.2
I/O 3×USB 3.0
HDMI 2.0b
Thunderbolt 3/USB-C
Wireless Killer Wireless-AC 1535
Dimensions 13.6" × 9.3 " × 0.70"
345 mm × 235 mm × 17.8 mm
Weight 1.86 kg
4.1 lbs
1.95 kg
4.3 lbs
1.93 kg
4.25 lbs
Battery 70 Wh
Keyboard Razer Chroma anti-ghosting
Price $1899 unknown $1999-$2199

As for the rest I/O capabilities, they remained very similar to those of the last year’s Razer Blade models (because the chassis and the motherboard are the same as those used on the late 2016 Blade): Rivet Networks' Killer 1535 802.11 2×2 Wi-Fi + BT 4.1 controller, one Thunderbolt 3/USB 3.1 Type-C port, three USB 3.0 headers, an HDMI 2.0b output, a 2 MP webcam, built-in speakers and a microphone, a TRRS audio connector, a keyboard with RGB backlighting and so on. In a bid to appeal to those who care about security, there is a TPM 2.0 security chip installed.

The new Razer Blade notebooks with FHD screens are available now in North America and Europe starting from US$1,899/C$2,749/€2.149/£1.799. The laptops with 4K UHD panels will be available in Q2 and Razer does not have pricing available at the moment, but expect it to be similarly priced to the outgoing QHD+ model.

Related Reading:

Source: Razer

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • ingwe - Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - link

    I like this but would like to see charging done via a second type C.
  • RaichuPls - Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - link

    Can't, type C only allows up to 100w charging. This comes with a 180w adapter.
  • ingwe - Wednesday, February 15, 2017 - link

    You are correct. I completely didn't think of that.
  • tecknohow - Wednesday, February 15, 2017 - link

    That's incorrect. USB-PD is up to 100w; the USB Type-C Port, if it even has a specified limit, is higher than this. For example, the Dell XPS 15 (9550) charges at the laptop's full 130w over Type-C when using their WD-15 dock.
  • lazarpandar - Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - link

    It's still got that thick bezel.........
  • twtech - Saturday, February 25, 2017 - link

    I would have liked to see that mechanical keyboard the pro version has make it to this model.
  • admnor - Friday, March 17, 2017 - link

    Complaining that this thing "only" has a GTX 1060 is completely missing the point. I travel *a lot* and a 4lb, 14" laptop is something I can chuck in my backpack and happily carry around. A 7 or 8lb 17" laptop is not a viable option. So, should I give up on any hopes of gaming while abroad, or should I spring for the best available option, with excellent build quality, and a CPU/GPU combination that will run games perfectly well at 1920x1080*. According to VRMark it'll even acceptably drive an Oculus Rift (which, by the way, I could also throw in the bag and it would still weigh less than one of these desktop-replacement 17" 1080-toting monsters).

    * Which *is* native resolution if you go for the anti-glare non-touch FHD screen, and why you'd pay all that extra for a higher-resolution glass touchscreen that, let's be honest, you're not really going to actually touch anyway, so it's just going to (a) drain the battery, (b) make the thing heavier, (c) be unusable in bright light, and (d) make games look worse than they would on the FHD.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now