AOC Announces AGON AG322QC4 32-Inch Curved LCD with FreeSync 2 & DisplayHDR 400by Anton Shilov on April 18, 2018 10:00 AM EST
AOC on Wednesday introduced its first gaming display that supports AMD’s FreeSync 2 technology, making this just the second line of FreeSync 2 monitors to be announced thus far. The curved 32-inch AGON AG322QC4 monitor has a QHD resolution as well as a 144 Hz refresh rate, which is in line with other gaming monitors these days. The monitor also carries DisplayHDR 400 certification, meaning it falls under the VESA's entry-level HDR tier.
The AOC AGON AG322QC4 is based on a 32-inch VA panel featuring a 2560×1440 resolution, a 400 nits peak brightness, a 2000:1 static contrast ratio, a 144 Hz refresh rate, a 4 ms GtG response time, and a 1800R curvature. The key selling points of the AGON AG322QC4 are of course AMD’s FreeSync 2 with Low Framerate Compensation technology as well as the DisplayHDR 400 badge. AOC yet has to reveal the FreeSync 2 range supported by the display, but since the monitor is a couple of months away, its firmware may still be in development. Meanwhile, since AMD mandates all FreeSync 2 displays to support LFC, which requires the maximum framerate to be at least 2x the minimum framerate, the FreeSync range of the AG322QC4 should be pretty wide (from at least 72 Hz to 144 Hz).
Update 4/18: As it turns out, AMD mandates FreeSync 2 displays to support at least 90% of the DCI-P3 color space.
AOC itself does not define color gamuts supported by the AGON AG322QC4, so the only thing that is safe to say here is that it does support sRGB for Windows and something more than that because of its key features. AMD’s FreeSync 2 requirements include mandatory support for a wider-than-sRGB color range, to be more precise, the GPU developer requires FreeSync 2 to support at least 90% of the DCI-P3 color gamut.
but does not include specifics (e.g., mandatory 95% of the DCI-P3). Meanwhile, the DisplayHDR 400 spec only mandates 95% of the sRGB-like BT.709 color space for the color gamut. In other words, nothing about this HDR monitor specifically requires a DCI-P3 color gamut. So if the AG322QC4 can support a wider color gamut, then it's not in any of the specificiations at this time.
Moving on, as a gaming monitor AOC’s AGON displays not only support premium features, but are also outfitted with the company’s proprietary firmware-based technologies aimed at the target audience. Therefore, the AG322QC4 supports various Game Mode presets for different types of genres, the Shadow Control function to quickly brighten dark areas, Low Input Lag mode for fast-paced games (not sure whether the LIL will be needed for FreeSync 2-supporting games), and some other features. The monitor uses AOC’s Ergo Base stand that can adjust height, tilt, and swivel. As a bonus capability, the AGON AG322QC4 display has LEDs (red, green or blue) on the lower bezel and the back of the chassis with three intensity levels for personalization, and to emphasize the gaming nature of the product.
As for connectivity. The AGON AG322QC4 is equipped with DisplayPort and HDMI inputs, a dual-port USB 3.0 hub as well as 3.5-mm audio jacks for headphones and a mic.
|The AOC AGON AG322QC4|
|Native Resolution||2560 × 1440|
|Maximum Refresh Rate||144 Hz|
|Response Time||4 ms GtG|
|Brightness||400 cd/m² (peak)|
|Viewing Angles||178°/178° horizontal/vertical|
|Color Gamut||>95% sRGB/BT.709
|Dynamic Refresh Rate Tech||AMD FreeSync 2|
|Pixel Pitch||0.2767 mm²|
|Pixel Density||91.79 PPI|
|Audio||3.5 mm input and output|
|USB Hub||2 × USB 3.0 Type-A connectors
1 × USB 3.0 Type-B input
US: ~$600 (not confirmed)
AOC plans to start selling its AGON AG322QC4 display in Europe this June. The LCD will be priced at £529 in the U.K. and €599 in mainland Europe. At this point we do not have any information regarding availability and pricing of the AG322QC4 in the U.S., but it is safe to say that it will hit North America this summer and judging by its MSRP in the EU, it is highly likely that AOC’s 32-inch FreeSync 2-supporting LCD will carry a ~$600 price tag without taxes in the U.S.
AMD introduced its FreeSync 2 technology in early 2017. Samsung was the first to support the technology with its Quantum Dot-enhanced displays in early June last year and has been enjoying its FreeSync 2 monopoly since then. Initially, Samsung’s C49HG90, C32HG70, and C27HG70 suffered from teething problems — their FreeSync range was limited to 120 – 144 Hz at launch, but an updated firmware decreased the minimum to 72 Hz later on. Since the 32-inch FreeSync 2 monitor has been available on the market for a while, Samsung’s partners are offering it below its MSRP of $699. For example, the 32-inch FreeSync 2 supporting C32HG70 is now available for $616 - $646 from Amazon. With the arrival of other FreeSync 2-compatible displays, such as the AGON AG322QC4, prices of such LCDs will inevitably drop.
- Samsung Announces First Freesync 2 Monitors: CHG70 & CHG90 - Quantum Dots, Up to 49”, 144 Hz, DCI-P3
- AMD Announces FreeSync 2: Easier & Lower Latency HDR Gaming
- Microsoft and AMD to Bring FreeSync 2 Support to Xbox One S and Xbox One X This Spring
- AOC Expands AGON Family with Curved AG322QCX and AG272FCX 144 Hz Displays
- AOC Launches the AG352QCX: 35-Inch 200 Hz 2560×1080 Curved Display with Adaptive-Sync
- AOC Announces the AGON AG352UCG 21:9 Curved Display: 35", 3440×1440, 100Hz with G-Sync
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Death666Angel - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkThe smaller the pixels, the better it looks at non-native or non-integer divisible resolutions. So I'd take a 27" 8k monitor with my GTX 960 no problem. Also, 4k is a 1080p integer resolution, so is 8k. You would get the clarity while doing non-intensive stuff and the framerates while gaming without losing fidelity.
edzieba - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkNot a 'limit', but severe diminishing returns. Fabbing LCD (and OLED) panels is a lithographic process, like fabbing silicon chips. The bigger the monolithic piece, the more likely a defect (or defects) will be present. This is why smartphone panels are nowhere near as dense as microdisplays, and why large desktop or TV panels are not as dense as smartphone panels.
Dug - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkAs someone that owns a 32" 4k monitor and a 32" 1440P, I can honestly say I prefer the 1440P for gaming and this is with a 1080ti. It's just so much smoother because of frame rates. If you are really gaming, then you aren't paying attention to the ppi unless you stick your head right up to the screen. For work, I prefer the 4k monitor but still have to raise the scale to 125% or everything is too small.
spe1491 - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkIf this was ultrawide I'd be a lot more interested. All the other specs look great.
justaviking - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkWhat is that "stick" from behind the right side of the monitor? Maybe I missed it in the article.
It looks like an antenna. Or a windshield wiper control.
Maybe a giant on/off switch for the LEDs?
ianmills - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linklol good catch. it makes this thing look like a mystical unicorn
ezridah - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkAt first I thought it was a WiFi antenna which seemed very odd, but after thinking about it for a few more seconds I'm guessing it's a headphone stand.
justaviking - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - linkI actually considered it might be a place to hang you headphones, but then thought, "Nahhh, it couldn't be that. That would be so ugly." But you're probably right.
Although... my "LED switch" could ba cool feature. Every "gamer" will want one. Variable brightness based on how far you rotate the switch. And if you twist it, maybe you could change the colors too. Ooo! I wonder if I should patent it. Soon you will have similar switches on your case, your coolers, your memory sticks, maybe even on your cell phone! Remember, you saw it here first.
Kotonyekia - Tuesday, April 24, 2018 - linkGuys, i know, you love vulgar girls
What about online communication with them without limits? Here http://sexbadoo.ga you can find horny real girls from different countries.
Average Joe - Friday, November 16, 2018 - linksorry to be a necromancer and raise the dead post here, I'm looking for a new screen but black Friday is so close I may as well wait. Doesn't a 24" 1080p panel have a PPI of 109 and a 32" 1440p panels also have a PPI of 109? Windows 10 is dreadful with scaling fonts so people with 27" 1440p screen think they look a bit crisper and 32" screens are identicle to 24" 1440p panels.