Qualcomm this week has announced three new chipsets complementing their low-mid-range and low-range processor offerings: the Snapdragon 720G, 662, and 460 SoCs. The new chipsets are said to focus on emerging markets such as India and are also amongst the first to offer platform connectivity features such as the new Navigation with Indian Constellation (NavIC).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 700-Range SoCs
SoC Snapdragon 710 Snapdragon 720G Snapdragon 730
CPU 2x Kryo 360 (CA75)
@ 2.2GHz 

6x Kryo 360 (CA55)
@ 1.7GHz
2x Kryo 465 (CA76)
@ 2.3GHz
 
6x Kryo 465 (CA55)
@ 1.8GHz
2x Kryo 470 (CA76)
@ 2.2GHz
 
6x Kryo 470 (CA55)
@ 1.8GHz
GPU Adreno 616 Adreno 618
DSP Hexagon 685  Hexagon 692 Hexagon 688
ISP/
Camera
Spectra 250
32MP single / 20MP dual
Spectra 350L
32MP single / 16MP dual
Spectra 350
36MP single / 22MP dual
Memory 2x 16-bit @ 1866MHz
LPDDR4X
14.9GB/s

1MB system cache
Integrated Modem Snapdragon X15 LTE
(Category 15/13)
DL = 800Mbps
3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
Encode/
Decode
2160p30, 1080p120
H.264 & H.265

10-bit HDR pipelines
Mfc. Process 10nm LPP 8nm LPP

Starting off with the Snapdragon 720G, the first we note that the features of the SoC looks extremely similar to the Snapdragon 730. We never had a regular Snapdragon 720 so it’s a bit weird for Qualcomm to directly come out with a “G” version which is usually used for denominating a better GPU / gaming binned variant of an SoC.

The Snapdragon 720G shares the same feature set as the Snapdragon 730, but comes with an extra 100MHz boost on the big cores. Other small differences between the two SoCs is Qualcomm’s description of it using a newer Hexagon 692 DSP as opposed to the 688 variant in the S730.

All in all, whilst this should be a new silicon design, in practice it feels more of a stepping variant of the Snapdragon 730.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 600-Range SoCs
SoC Snapdragon 660 Snapdragon 662 Snapdragon 665 Snapdragon 670 Snapdragon 675
CPU 4x Kryo 260 (CA73)
@ 2.2GHz

4x Kryo 260 (CA53)
@ 1.8GHz
4x Kryo 260 (CA73)
@ 2.0GHz

4x Kryo 260 (CA53)
@ 1.8GHz
4x Kryo 260 (CA73)
@ 2.0GHz

4x Kryo 260 (CA53)
@ 1.8GHz
2x Kryo 360 (CA75)
@ 2.0GHz 

6x Kryo 360 (CA55)
@ 1.7GHz
2x Kryo 460 (CA76)
@ 2.0GHz
 
6x Kryo 460 (CA55)
@ 1.7GHz
GPU Adreno 512 Adreno 610 Adreno 615 Adreno 612
DSP Hexagon 680  Hexagon 683  Hexagon 686  Hexagon 685 
ISP/
Camera
Spectra 160
24MP
Spectra 340T
25MP single / 16MP dual
Spectra 165
25MP single / 16MP dual
Spectra 250
25MP single / 16MP dual
Spectra 250
25MP single / 16MP dual
Memory 2x 16-bit @ 1866MHz
LPDDR4
14.9GB/s
2x 16-bit @ 1866MHz
LPDDR4X
14.9GB/s

1MB system cache
Integrated Modem Snapdragon X12 LTE Snapdragon X11 LTE
(Cat 12/13)

DL = 390Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
Snapdragon X12 LTE

(Category 12/13)

DL = 600Mbps
3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
Encode/
Decode
2160p30, 1080p120
H.264 & H.265
1080p60
H.264 & H.265
2160p30, 1080p120
H.264 & H.265
Mfc. Process 14nm LPP 11nm LPP 11nm LPP 10nm LPP 11nm LPP

In the Snapdragon 600 range we’ve seen a ton of releases over the last few years, which makes the new Snapdragon 662 even more weird in terms of how it’s positioned in the market. A lot like the S720G situation, the new S662 looks extremely similar to the Snapdragon 665.

The CPU and GPU configuration is said to be identical between the two chips, but then there’s some differing features such as a Spectra 340T ISP instead of a Spectra 165, as well as a Hexagon 683 versus a Hexagon 686. Admittedly, Qualcomm’s marketing naming here doesn’t necessarily mean there’s actual IP changes in the SoC, but it’s not the first time we’ve seen Qualcomm tape out almost identical SKUs over time.

A more notable difference in capabilities is in the media features as the S662 is only able to do 1080p60 video as opposed to 4K30 on the S665, as well as having a slightly worse X11 modem which can only do 2x carrier aggregation as opposed to 3x for the S665 X12 based modem.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400-Range SoCs
SoC Snapdragon 439 Snapdragon 450 Snapdragon 460
CPU 4x CA53
@ 2.2GHz 

4x CA53
@ 1.7GHz
8x CA53
@ 2.3GHz
4x Kryo 240 (CA73)
@ 1.8GHz
 
4x Kryo 240 (CA53)
@ ?GHz
GPU Adreno 505 Adreno 506 Adreno 610
DSP Hexagon 536 Hexagon 546 Hexagon 683
ISP/
Camera
Spectra 
21MP single / 8MP dual
Spectra 
21MP single / 13MP dual
Spectra 340
36MP single / 22MP dual
Memory 1x 32-bit @ 933MHz
LPDDR3
7.4GB/s
2x 16-bit @ 1866MHz
LPDDR4X
14.9GB/s
Integrated Modem Snapdragon X6 LTE
(Category 4/5)

DL = 150Mbps
2x10MHz CA, 64-QAM

UL = 75Mbps
1x10MHz CA, 64-QAM
Snapdragon X9 LTE
(Category 7/13)

DL = 300Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM

UL = 150Mbps
2x10MHz CA, 64-QAM
Snapdragon X11 LTE
(Cat 12/13)

DL = 390Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
Encode/
Decode
1080p30
H.264
1080p60
H.264 & H.265
Mfc. Process 12nm LPP 14nm LPP 11nm LPP

Actually, the biggest news this week was the announcement of the Snapdragon 460. Unlike the less exciting 720G and 662, the 460 represents a big leap over its predecessors, finally representing a major upgrade to the 2017 Snapdragon 450.

The Snapdragon 460 for the first time now brings big CPU cores into the 400-range which should be almost a 2x increase in performance over past series chipsets. Qualcomm here is making use of 4x Cortex A73 derived CPUs at up to 1.8GHz, alongside 4x A53 derived CPUs at an undisclosed clock (likely a similar 1.8GHz).

The GPU sees a big upgrade in transitioning to the 600 Adreno series with the Adreno 610, and Qualcomm is quoting a 60-70% performance uplift compared to the Snapdragon 450.

The new chip also now for the first time support LPDDR4X, doubling up on the available bandwidth in this low-range of SoCs. The new chipset is manufactured on a Samsung 11LPP process node, which should be a nice efficiency upgrade over the 14nm process of the S450.

Devices based on the Snapdragon 720G are expected to be available this quarter, while 662 and 460 devices are expected towards the end of 2020.

Related Reading:

Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Monday, January 27, 2020 - link

    The first concern in low-end SoCs is cost, which used to just mean area but now means a balance of area and manufacturing node (sub-14nm nodes are becoming significantly more expensive for a given area). Given those constraints, keeping the SoC on as large a node as possible while still keeping its size as small as possible results in the lowest cost.

    Added to that, you'll always want *some* small cores for power savings - a 4-core A7x design would perform better than 8-core A5x but would sap more power (and probably still be larger in terms of die area). You could go for a balance, but every large core you add increases die size and design complexity more than a small core would, increasing costs.

    The imperfect solution is to add more of the small cores for a big number on the spec sheet, lower power usage, lowest possible cost and serviceable performance in tasks like web browsing that actually benefit from all of those cores.
  • quadrivial - Friday, January 24, 2020 - link

    Should the 720G cores be 475 instead of 465?
  • levizx - Thursday, January 30, 2020 - link

    They are named 465 for a reason, the frequency is higher so more likely they've cut down L2/L3$.
  • Tabalan - Friday, January 24, 2020 - link

    Wait a moment... Is Snapdragon 460 and 662 almost identical spec vise? Why release both is there is almost no difference?

    Also, I'd love more clear naming pattern from Qualcomm. Right now without checking spec it's almost impossible to guess which SoC is better. For example SD660 has better CPU and modem than 662, while later has better GPU, ISP, DSP. I mean, the check?
  • Marlin1975 - Friday, January 24, 2020 - link

    Looks like its a binning difference. The 460 runs slower on the CPU side. Good way to keep from having to throw away chips that don't bin high enough for the 662.

    That and if sells are flat for the 662 they can sell as 460s.
  • eek2121 - Sunday, January 26, 2020 - link

    Identical spec wise? They are completely different! Look at the charts again.
  • GC2:CS - Friday, January 24, 2020 - link

    Step it up Qualcomm. We know you can take your confusing naming and configurations up a notch this year.

    Btw. Who would want a pure cortex A53 chipset anyway at anytime ?
  • euskalzabe - Sunday, January 26, 2020 - link

    Literally the vast majority of consumers who know nothing other than "oh look, it has (insert number) cores, that's good right?
  • Ro_Ja - Saturday, January 25, 2020 - link

    They got the clock speed on the 450 wrong, its only 1.8ghz
  • Solo450 - Saturday, January 25, 2020 - link

    What the article doesn't mention is that the 460, 662 and 720G are the first SoCs of the 4, 6 and 7 series to support Bluetooth 5.1 and the 460 and 662 are the first SoCs of the 4 and 6 series to be "802.11ax-ready".

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now