AMD’s Bulldozer microarchitecture was originally designed with mainstream and high-performance applications in mind, but eventually its development took a turn to focus solely on mainstream mobile and desktop PCs. Today, processors based on AMD’s Excavator architecture — the pinnacle of Bulldozer’s evolution — are positioned as entry-level solutions and compete against lower-end products from Intel, including those powered by Atom-class processors that were designed from the ground up to be cheap and energy-efficient. Looking to fill a need for fully integrated motherboards for this market, Biostar has launched a Mini-ITX motherboard that is based on AMD’s Bristol Ridge APU and is meant to compete against Intel’s Gemini Lake-based offerings.

The Biostar A10N-9630E Mini ITX Quad Core SoC motherboard is powered by the A10-9630P with two Piledriver modules clocked at 2.60 GHz – 3.30 GHz (four cores in Bulldozer’s classification) with 1 MB L2 cache per module as well as AMD Radeon R5 GPU with 384 stream processors (GCN 3rd Gen). The SoC has a TDP of 35 W and it was initially designed for laptops as well as compact desktops.

Overall, Biostar compares CPU and GPU performance of the SoC to that of Intel’s Celeron J4105 SoC with four Goldmont Plus cores clocked at 1.50 GHz – 2.50 GHz as well as Intel’s UHD Graphics 600 with a TDP of 10W. Based on Biostar’s benchmarks, AMD’s processor offers a significantly higher CPU efficiency as well as a massively higher GPU performance (see performance figures below).

While AMD’s Bristol Ridge platform is clearly more power hungry than Intel’s Gemini Lake, it is also considerably faster, which is fine for desktop machines. But there is a catch. AMD’s Bristol Ridge has the company’s UVD 6.0 decoder that supports up to H.265 codec version 1 main profile (for 4K content) for 8-bit content, but not VP9. By contrast, Intel’s Gemini Lake has a video decoder that supports both H.265 and VP9 as well as 10-bit HDR (for 4K content). Considering that low-power desktops are usually used primarily for media playback, the Gemini Lake has an edge over the Bristol Ridge.

Since AMD’s Bristol Ridge uses a BGA form-factor, the A10-9630P chip cannot be upgraded. Meanwhile, the A10N-9630E board has everything a typical inexpensive platform does, including a PCIe 3.0 x16 slot that runs in x8 mode (as Bristol Ridge has 8 PCIe lanes for graphics) and allows to install a graphics card that supports all the latest and greatest video decoding capabilities, two DDR4 memory slots supporting two 16 GB DDR4-2400 modules, an M.2-2280 slot supporting SSDs with a PCIe 3.0 x4 or SATA 6 Gbps interface, and two SATA 6 Gbps connectors.

I/O capabilities of the Biostar A10N-9630E are fairly standard for entry-level PCs, so it has two display outputs (a D-Sub for legacy monitors and an HDMI for modern screens with HDCP support), a GbE port with LAN surge protection (controlled by the Realtek RTL 8111H chip), four USB Type-A connectors (two USB 2.0, two USB 3.0), PS/2 ports for mice/keyboards, and 7.1-channel audio connectors.

Brief Specifications of Biostar's Bristol Ridge Mini-ITX Motherboards
PCH integrated
Memory  2 × DIMM slots, up to 32 GB of DDR4-2400
Storage M.2 1 × M.2-2280 SSD with SATA or PCIe 4.0 x4 interface
Graphics AMD Radeon R5 integrated GPU
PCIe 3.0 x16 slot operating in x8 mode
Wi-Fi -
Ethernet 1 × GbE (Realtek RTL 8111H)
Display Outputs 1 × D-Sub
1 × HDMI
Audio 7.1-channel audio (Realtek ALC887)
USB Internal 2 × USB 2.0 Type-A
2 × USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-A
External 2 × USB 2.0 Type-A
2 × USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-A
Additional I/O -
Power 24-pin ATX

Biostar has not announced pricing of its A10N-9630E Mini-ITX motherboard, though it made it fairly clear that we are dealing with an entry-level product, so one can make guesses.

Related Reading:

Source: Biostar

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Marlin1975 - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    Interesting and has potential. But a lot of that will depend on the pricing. If its to high I rather build a small system with a Ryzen 3000G.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    I could see myself owning one of these little motherboards if the price is reasonable. A pity it doesn't have integrated wireless, but that is a relatively easy problem to resolve.
  • SolarAxix - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    Looks like there's a typo in the specification table. It mentions that the A10N-9630E has two SO-DIMM slots when it's supposed to be DIMM slots.
  • schujj07 - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    Why not make this using an Athlon 200GE instead? You get generally better ST & MT performance than even the more expensive and faster A12-9800 (A12-9800 is faster than A10-9630P) plus an iGPU that is at least equal to the A10-9630P. All within the same TDP and being on the newer generation of motherboards.
  • Marlin1975 - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    This chip is a mobile chip so it contains the "southbridge" chipset on it. The A12-9800 or AM4 ryzen based ones will still requires another chip for I/O functions.

    So price and simplicity works better for these older mobile chips AMD is dumping.
  • Lightkey - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    The *300 series "chipset" without southbridge exists for Ryzen APUs. Which is why I don't understand that all motherboard vendors stopped development of those after the beta phase except for ASRock, who also only sell it in their barebone DeskMini A300 but that allows for a very low idle power draw of only 7 Watts.
  • ET - Tuesday, March 17, 2020 - link

    My guess would be because Biostar already had a design for Carrizo and it was easy to upgrade it to Bristol Ridge, and a Ryzen derived CPU would have needed at the very least more validation, and because AMD has stocks of these old chips and it's selling them for peanuts.
  • uefi - Tuesday, March 17, 2020 - link

    Another reason is Windows 7 support. AMD doesn't provide win7 drivers for the integreated vega on Ryzen APUs.
  • rozquilla - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    These cute boards from Biostar are very difficult to find on the USA, I have seen recent models like A10N-8800E, A68N-5600E (both with old AMD CPUs like this A10-9630E) being sold upwards of $100 in eBay from sellers from Italy, Japan and China.

    I have an ASRock J5005-ITX in my HTPC which works great with a 4K TV, but also have a very old VIA Nano based ITX NAS system which I want to replace with something from AMD and these boards fit the bill, but no way José with those prices. Around $60 would be fine.

    So, I'm waiting for either a price drop, or mass availability stateside, or well, Embedded Ryzen boards for general consumers. So far only industry grade (and price!) boards are available.
  • evilspoons - Monday, March 16, 2020 - link

    The number of new products announced without pricing is frustrating. I've lost count of the monitors, SSDs, etc that I haven't given a second thought to buying because there's no pricing information from the manufacturer when they launch it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now