We’re back this week with another giveaway, this time courtesy of Seagate. After giving away some of their new Ironwolf 110 SSDs a couple of months back, this month the company has decided to up the ante. Rather than just giving away the SSDs, this time the company will be giving away a complete NAS setup, comprised of QNAP TS-932X-2G 9 bay NAS, as well as one of each of Seagate’s IronWolf Pro 16TB HDD and Ironwolf 110 240GB SSD.

Starting things off, we have QNAP’s TS-932X-2G, a business-class NAS. This is one of the company’s compact 9 bay NASes, sporting 5 3.5-inch SATA drive bays along with another 4 2.5-inch SATA bays. The NAS is designed particularly for tiered storage, with the 3.5-inch bays being ideal for HDDs, while the 2.5-inch bays can hold SSDs (or in a pinch, 2.5-inch HDDs). Under the hood, the 932X is based on a quad core ARM Cortex A57-based SoC, the Alpine AL-324, which runs at 1.7GHz. This specific model comes with 2GB of DDR4 pre-installed in the single SO-DIMM slot, though it can be upgraded.

In terms of I/O, the NAS comes with a trio of USB 3.0 Type-A ports, among other things. But perhaps the most interesting feature here is the NAS’s Ethernet support: a pair of GigE RJ45 ports, along with a pair of 10GigE SFP+ ports. Owing to its business-focused design, QNAP has opted for SFP+ ports, which means that the NAS can be equipped with any of several different flavors of 10GigE depending on what kind of cabling you’d like to use. The one downside to this is that it means the ports aren’t actually usable without buying a transceiver, so there’s an additional cost (10GBASE-T transceivers are ~$50) before 10GigE is actual usable.

CPU Model Alpine AL-324 (Cortex-A57)
Cores 4C
Freq. 1.7 GHz
Encryption Acceleration 256-bit AES
Memory Speed DDR4, one SO-DIMM slot
Capacity 2 GB, single-channel
Bays 5 × 3.5"
4 × 2.5"
Storage interface SATA 6 Gbps
Ethernet 2 × GbE
2 × 10 GbE SFP+
Audio 1 speaker
1 × 3.5mm audio out
USB 3 × USB 3.0 Type-A  
Other I/O Copy button, buzzer, LED notifications, etc.
Dimensions Height 183 mm | 7.19"
Width 225 mm | 8.85"
Depth 224 mm | 8.8"
Power Consumption Standby 21.66 W
Operating 42.15 W
MSRP $599

Seagate IronWolf HDD & SSD

Meanwhile from Seagate, we have a pair of IronWolf drives from them. For mass storage, the company is including their top capacity 16TB IronWolf HDD. A recently launched product from the company, the 16TB IronWolf is a helium-based 7200 RPM drive, and the highest capacity IronWolf drive from the company to date. As part of the IronWolf family it’s specifically designed for use in NASes, incorporating the necessary sensors and low-vibrational design to best handle being packed in tight with a number of other actively running HDDs.

Seagate is also including one of their IronWolf SSDs as well, the 240GB version of the IronWolf 110. The drives, based on 3D TLC NAND with sustained performance numbers of 560 / 535 MBps sequential reads / writes, support a relatively hearty 1 DWPD endurance, despite the usual read-heavy scenarios that NASes drive. This makes them well suited for use as cache drives, which is exactly what Seagate is going for in this giveaway with the QNAP NAS.

Seagate Ironwolf 110 Series Specifications
Capacity 240 GB 480 GB 960 GB 1920 GB 3840 GB
Form Factor 2.5" 7mm SATA
Sequential Read 560 MB/s
345 MB/s 535 MB/s
Random Read 55k IOPS 75k IOPS 90k IOPS 90k IOPS 85k IOPS
30k IOPS 50k IOPS 55k IOPS 50k IOPS 45k IOPS
Idle Power 1.2 W
Active Power 2.3 W 2.7 W 3.2 W 3.4 W 3.5 W
Warranty 5 years
435 TB
875 TB
1750 TB
3500 TB
7000 TB

The giveaway is running through September 27th and is open to all US residents (sorry, ROW!). You can enter below, and you can find more details (and the full discussion) about the giveaway over on the AnandTech Forums.

AnandTech Seagate IronWolf + QNAP NAS Giveaway

Source: AnandTech Forums

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • SSTANIC - Thursday, September 12, 2019 - link

  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, September 12, 2019 - link

    To be fair, we haven't run anything but a US giveaway in over half a decade. And for legal reasons, that won't be changing. The only giveaways we're allowed to run are for the US.
  • AdditionalPylons - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    I understand that you're not able to run international giveaways. Our complaints are not really about that. It would just be a very nice gesture to your significant number of non-US readers to put the "US only" in the title. Right now it feels like you only care about the US, which I'm sure is not your intention.
  • Reflex - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    Just make that assumption and move on. He just told you they are doing US only for legal reasons and there are no plans to change it. They'll announce if that changes, most likely.
  • Reflex - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    Your question was just answered. They haven't run international contests in years and have no intent to do so anytime soon, so you can safely just skip contest entries. No tag needed.
  • AdditionalPylons - Thursday, September 12, 2019 - link

    I've said it before. US only should be in the title!
  • AdditionalPylons - Thursday, September 12, 2019 - link

    "The one downside to this is that it means the ports aren’t actually usable without buying a transceiver, so there’s an additional cost (10GBASE-T transceivers are ~$50) before 10GigE is actual usable."

    This is just nonsense. For very many people SFP+ is a lot more desirable than 10Gbase-T. It is more power efficient, flexible (use either cheap DAC cables for short distances, e.g. within a rack, or optical transceivers for longer distances) and also cheaper, both on the NIC and switch side. There are many switches with SFP+ that are cheaper than switches with 10Gbase-T.
    Mikrotik CRS 326-24G-2S+RM, CRS305-1G-4S+IN, TP-Link JetStream T1700G-28TQ, D-Link DGS-1510-28X and FS S3900-24T4S just to name a few.
  • rpg1966 - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    The line you replied to merely states a fact; it makes no judgement on whether SFP+ is better or worse than 10Gbase-T for various use-cases.
  • AdditionalPylons - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    The statement assumes that people would require 10Gbase-T, and thus the extra cost.
  • Jorgp2 - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    Yeah, 10G Ethernet PHYs seem to cost more.

    Ethernet transceivers also cost more than fiber transceivers.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now