ASRock X58 Extreme - $169.99 is not too Extreme
by Gary Key on July 2, 2009 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
General Performance – PCMark Vantage
Futuremark's PCMark Vantage x64 is probably the single most diverse set of standardized benchmarks one can run on a system to mimic real world usage scenarios. The TV and Movies, Gaming, and Music Suites can be frighteningly difficult to pass when a system is not set up correctly. We've had boards in the labs that will pass hours of Prime95 torture testing or OCCT that fail even the basic 30 minute run of PCMark Vantage, let alone the full 1 hour and 30 minute test run that we loop five times.
The X58 Extreme performed admirably in this benchmark with overall results slightly trailing the MSI and ASUS boards. However, the user will never notice the minimal performance differences in actual usage between all three boards. We fired up our application benchmarks from the full review test suite and in each case, the ASRock board trailed slightly (never more than 1%) in applications ranging from Sony Vegas Pro 9.0 to AutoCAD 2009. Obviously, price to performance ratios with the board are very good, but just under the MSI offering.
Gaming Performance – FarCry 2
This title has beautiful graphics, an open ended environment, and is fun to play. If you dial up the graphics options, the game rewards with you some fantastic visuals courtesy of the Dunia Engine. The game also features the most impressive benchmark tool we have seen in a PC game. We set the performance feature set to Very High, graphics to High, and enable DX10 with AA set to 2x. The in-game benchmark tool is utilized with the Ranch Small level and we report an average of three test runs.
The press information from ASRock indicated excellent graphics performance with this board and in this particular game title, it does not disappoint. We have noticed the same pattern at 1680x1050 and in other games in early testing.
First Thoughts –
ASRock went back to the X58 drawing board and it shows. At a $169.99 price tag, we expected a motherboard lacking in features or performance. However, ASRock added features ranging from handy rest/power/CMOS switches to a very good 8-phase power supply along with just about every standard option a user expects on higher-end boards. Performance is very solid and even overclocking does not disappoint, certainly not for users on air or self-contained water cooling solutions.
The board tends to have higher Vdroop (.04~.05V) than the MSI or Gigabyte (.02~.03V) boards in this price sector, you can disable Vdroop although we recommend against it. There are some inconsistencies in the BIOS feature descriptions in the voltage section. We would have preferred better memory performance above DDR3-1600 speeds, not so much for application performance improvements as they are minimal, but we tended to use slightly higher VDimm/VTT voltages than we did on the MSI board at like settings. S3 resume works properly and ASRock now offers basic fan speed control on each header although temperature based control is still missing.
At this point in testing, we have found no obvious reasons not to recommend the X58 Extreme for users seeking balanced performance and features at a very reasonable price point, well, for X58 products. The board does not have the overclocking prowess of more expensive boards but it will not embarrass you either. We tend to look at the overall aspects of a product and the company building it instead of focusing on Super Pi or 3DMark numbers. As such, it appears that ASRock has delivered another outstanding product for the budget hunter in all of us.
44 Comments
View All Comments
MichaelD - Friday, July 3, 2009 - link
Very informative mini-review and apparently, an excellent job by Asrock! As said in the review "we're focusing on everyday, stable overclocks and not maximum benchmarking"; that's where I'm at too AFA overclocks go. The price of X58 motherboards has kept me away from upgrading; this motherboard is considerably cheaper, feature rich (enough for me, anyway) and may just be the straw that broke the camel's back for me. Thanks for bringing this gem to public light.ytoledano1 - Friday, July 3, 2009 - link
Couldn't boards be made cheaper if they came with only one 16x PCIE slot? I'm building a computer which will run a medium sized database. To say that graphics isn't my top priority would be an understatement.I would however love to see a cheap board with 8 memory dimms! (I don't care for triple-channel, I'd rather have more memory installed)
sotti - Saturday, July 4, 2009 - link
1 16x slot wouldn't save you any money because the x58 already has the PCIe lanes for 2 16x slots.You can't have 8 dimm slots because the CPU only supports 2 dimm slots per channel. If you really need more than 24GB of memory then you should be looking at FB dimms anyway.
sotti - Friday, July 3, 2009 - link
I'm shopping X58's right now (the P55 doesn't seem to be close enought to justify putting it off).I'm on a tight budget, but also want to get the right components to hit my goal (4ghz).
This board seems to be it.
Would there be any reason to spend a little more to get a gigabyte UD3R, Asus P6T SE or Foxconn Flamming Blade?
drizek - Thursday, July 2, 2009 - link
I thought I would never see a hardware review site review a processor the way I actually use it. Overclocking to ridiculous speeds is fun for sure, but it is also seems pretty useless to me, at least for the things I use my computer for.I took advantage of the overclocking headroom of my 720BE to lower the voltage and the temps to stop my computer from being a loud space heater during the summer. I can't imagine running it at 1.4/5v just to get a few hundred extra mhz out of it, except maybe in the winter, and even then only if your heater is inefficiently running on electricity instead of natural gas.
tviceman - Thursday, July 2, 2009 - link
What's the deal with the lower frame rates with Far Cry 2 @ 4.2 ghz vs. 3.3ghz? That does not make any sense.jordanclock - Thursday, July 2, 2009 - link
It makes plenty of sense. It's called a margin of error.tviceman - Saturday, July 4, 2009 - link
Margins of error do not account for 20% variance in frame rates, but thanks!I ask again, why does 3.3 ghz post significantly higher maximum frame rates than 4.2 ghz?
HollyDOL - Thursday, July 2, 2009 - link
Folks, sorry to be nosy but given pics I can see only three PCI-E slots on the board contrary to first paragraph last sentence...Or I am already blind which can be the case as well ;-)
HollyDOL - Thursday, July 2, 2009 - link
Taking back, I am blind... it was mentioning the other board...