Following up on this weekend's statement from AMD about a potential power issue with the reference Radeon RX 480, AMD has just sent over their previously promised update on their progress dealing with the issue.

In short, they are nearly finished preparing their updated driver, 16.7.1, which will be posted "within the next 48 hours" (which at this point is late Thursday). The new driver will offer two solutions to the power problem.

The default solution: shift some of the power load off of the PCIe Graphics (PEG) slot connector, presumably in order to bring power consumption within PCIe spec. Note that AMD doesn't say anything about reducing the total power consumption, and given option #2, it's reasonable to assume that this involves holding the power requirements as-is and shifting the load to the external 6-pin power connector. Based on earlier data this would potentially put the 6-in connector further over spec, but the vast majority of PSUs are very tolerant of this going out of spec.

The optional solution: a toggle that reduces the total power consumption of the card, presumably ensuring both the PEG slot and 6-pin power connector stay below their respective limits. Since the RX 480 is already throttling at times due to power limits, this would further hurt performance, but it's also the most standards-compliant solution (and aptly named "compatibility" mode). AMD notes that this option will have "minimal performance impact", and while we'll have to see the results in the benchmarks, it's worth noting that power consumption is cubic - that is, roughly to the 3rd power of frequency - so a small reduction in frequency can significantly reduce power consumption, as we've seen in the case of the Radeon R9 Nano.

Along with this, AMD is also touting some slight performance optimizations in this driver that they hope will offset any performance loss (though I'd note that these optimizations would have come anyhow). We'll have more on this when AMD ships their driver.

In the meantime AMD's full statement is as follows:

We promised an update today (July 5, 2016) following concerns around the Radeon™ RX 480 drawing excess current from the PCIe bus. Although we are confident that the levels of reported power draws by the Radeon RX 480 do not pose a risk of damage to motherboards or other PC components based on expected usage, we are serious about addressing this topic and allaying outstanding concerns. Towards that end, we assembled a worldwide team this past weekend to investigate and develop a driver update to improve the power draw. We’re pleased to report that this driver—Radeon Software 16.7.1—is now undergoing final testing and will be released to the public in the next 48 hours.

In this driver we’ve implemented a change to address power distribution on the Radeon RX 480 – this change will lower current drawn from the PCIe bus.

Separately, we’ve also included an option to reduce total power with minimal performance impact. Users will find this as the “compatibility” UI toggle in the Global Settings menu of Radeon Settings. This toggle is “off” by default.

Finally, we’ve implemented a collection of performance improvements for the Polaris architecture that yield performance uplifts in popular game titles of up to 3%1. These optimizations are designed to improve the performance of the Radeon RX 480, and should substantially offset the performance impact for users who choose to activate the “compatibility” toggle.

AMD is committed to delivering high quality and high performance products, and we’ll continue to provide users with more control over their product’s performance and efficiency. We appreciate all the feedback so far, and we’ll continue to bring further performance and performance/W optimizations to the Radeon RX 480.

1: Based on data running ’Total War: Warhammer’, ultra settings, 1080p resolution. Radeon Software 16.6.2 74.2FPS vs Radeon Software 16.7.1 78.3FPS; Metro Last Light, very high settings, 1080p resolution, 80.9FPS vs 82.7 FPS. Witcher 3, Ultra settings, 1440p, 31.5FPS vs 32.5, Far Cry 4, ultra settings, 1440p, 54.65FPS vs 56.38FPS, 3DMark11 Extreme, 22.8 vs 23.7  System config: Core i7-5960X, 16GB DDR4-2666MHz, Gigabyte X99-UD4, Windows 10 64-bit. Performance figures are not average, may vary from run-to-run.

Comments Locked

121 Comments

View All Comments

  • vladx - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    You forgot just one LITTLE detail: RX 480 is a budget card mainly targeted at people with budget systems.

    Tech sites users are not indicative of the general customer population buying this card.
  • silverblue - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    I do love how a $200 to $250 card is "budget" to a lot of people commenting on these sorts of articles. Are the 970 and 390 budget cards?

    My 950 is "budget" at half the price of the 480; I'd class the 480 as mainstream at worst.
  • barleyguy - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    Agreed. $250 isn't really a low budget video card for non-enthusiasts. Also, the reference cards are absolutely going to enthusiasts. They are the early adopters that bought things on Day 1 while fighting high demand. The casual users that would normally be in the budget market won't be buying these until much later, when most of the cards will be custom.

    Personally I'm planning to get an RX 470. It should be about 50 watts lower in power usage and still good enough for my 1080p monitor.
  • Peter2k - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    It's pretty amusing that some still don't get it

    No one cares that the rx480 pulled more power than the stated TDP
    Every card does this, ever part you OC does this
    Everyone knows

    People care that the card draws more power over the weakest link, the PCIE slot
    And
    It's a cheaper card for cheaper systems
    The boards I've heard about getting (supposedly) damaged where old AMD boards to begin with

    AMD actually is bringing out a fix, because it's true
    The card will draw more power over the power connector
    The part that can actually handle the additional current
  • pencea - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    "we’ll be back in a few days with our full review"

    Right... That's whats written in both preview articles of the GTX 1080 & 480X preview. It's been over a month, and yet still no reviews of the GTX 1080 or GTX 1070 in sight.

    As for the 480X it's officially been a week and no reviews for it too...
  • silverblue - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    Ryan said that the 480 review would be quickly followed by the 1080 review.
  • catavalon21 - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    I do have to say, this is one of the more eyebrow-raising cases I can recall of products garnering a lot of attention, to get the review treatment of well, nothing special. Some previews, some promises for more, and yes, there are benchmarks for all 3 cards in the AT GPU 2016 charts section, but it's just bizarre. Still, I keep coming back for more...
  • catavalon21 - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    ...because irritating brand-trash-talk notwithstanding, even in these 11 screens of comments there is a lot of very good technical discussion on the issue.
  • BrokenCrayons - Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - link

    I'd like to see the new performance numbers of the card once its using the so-called compatibility mode before getting very excited one way or the other about the issue, the company, or its competitors. In the end, though I like the 480 up to this point mainly for its price, I'm probably not going to end up making a purchase since I want a GPU that doesn't need an external power connector at all AND is within spec for demanding power from the expansion slot. In order for that to happen on 14/16nm, it's going to be a waiting game while AMD and NV get around to producing their smaller/better little GPUs.
  • enryu - Friday, July 8, 2016 - link

    From the quote on the 3% extra game performance:
    "... System config: Core i7-5960X, 16GB DDR4-2666MHz, Gigabyte X99-UD4, Windows 10 64-bit"

    Does this mean AMD uses an Intel Testplatform? Or Are those benchmarks not from AMD?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now