Test Setup

Professional testing requires the emulation of real-world situations but with repeatable results; thus, a perfectly controllable test setup and environment are required, especially for comparable results. Testing the thermal performance of any case with a typical real-world setup technically limits the comparability of the results to this setup alone, as an active system interacts with its environment and the change of a single component would alter myriads of variables. As such, we developed synthetic loads that emulate the thermal output of real systems, which however are passive, steady and quantifiable. As such, the thermal testing now displays the thermal capabilities of the case alone, as if it would have to deal with the entire thermal load by itself, regardless of the system that would be installed inside it. Laboratory data loggers are being used to monitor the PT100 sensors and control the safety relays, which are fully accessible via our custom software. Three such loads have been developed; the ATX version simulates a 200W CPU, 50W VRM, 30W RAM and 4 × 120W GPU card thermal load. Finally, three 3.5" HDD dummy loads have also been created, with each of them converting 30 W of electrical power to thermal, bringing the total thermal load of the ATX test setup up to 850 Watts. As such, the thermal load is immense and only the best of cases will be able to handle it for more than a few minutes, we are also performing a test with a thermal load of 400W, with all of the aforementioned components except the HDD drives at about 42% power, which is more suitable for the majority of cases.

Noise testing has been performed with a background noise level of 30.4dB(A). Advanced noise testing is also being performed, in order to assess the ability of the case to dampen the noise of the components installed inside it. This includes the installation of two noise-generating sources (strong fans) inside the case, one positioned approximately over the first expansion slot and one over the CPU area, which generate ≈ 44.2 dB(A) when unobstructed. During the advanced noise test, all stock cooling options of the case are entirely disabled.

Do note that the In Win 303 can support only two 3.5” devices, so the total actual thermal load in every test is reduced by 30W.

Results & Discussion

A quick look at our thermal performance results would suggest that the performance of the In Win 303 is very poor comparably to other similar cases. Even though this is the case when looking at the raw performance numbers, we need to consider that the In Win 303 does not have a single stock fan installed. Without even one stock fan to be found, we actually expected our testing to fail entirely, with the testing equipment reaching temperatures that would force the failsafe to kick in. That the In Win 303 managed to even complete our thermal testing was a pleasant surprise, hinting that it should maintain reasonable temperatures with a low to medium power PC installed, even without any additional cooling fans. For gaming PCs and advanced systems however, the In Win 303 could certainly use a couple of good fans. We should also add that the temperature of the 3.5” drives was relatively high. Their placement suggests that they will always be receiving minimal cooling, so it is clear that these slots are meant for efficient mainstream storage HDDs. High performance models could easily reach uncomfortably high operating temperatures under heavy load.

As the In Win 303 has no stock cooling or any other moving parts, it understandably does not make any noise at all by itself. The noise of the system will solely depend on the parts and fans that will be installed by the user. Our advanced noise testing revealed that the In Win 303 has very good noise dampening capabilities, dampening the noise of the installed testing equipment significantly. Our instrumentation measured a drop of 4 dB(A) during our advanced testing, a substantial figure for a case without additional sound dampening material installed on its panels.

The Interior of the In Win 303 Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • Aerodrifting - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    Is everyone purposely avoiding the topic on cooling or plain forgot?
    There is little clearance to install fans on the "bottom air intake" due to any ATX motherboard extends to the bottom of the case, Not to mention the space underneath the case is tiny due to short case feet. The top/side vent is a joke.
    Sure the glass looks good, But I will not consider building any high end system inside this case if it's going to cook the components with its "no-airflow-design"
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    I suspect the bottom holes are intended as passive intake for a negative pressure design with the fans on a top mounted radiator providing the overall airflow. I'm not a fan of bottom intake without casters or really big feet. On a carpet standard tiny feet tend to sink in deep enough to plug them entirely. Not a problem on hardwood, but your case ends up acting like a vacuum cleaner and the bottom mounted filter doesn't have visible indicators when it gets filthy and clogged.
  • Aerodrifting - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    My point exactly, Also "negative pressure design" never worked well, It's more of an excuse and translate to "we messed up on the airflow design".
    I have been building computer for over 10 years, In Win never struck me as a quality case maker. One day they woke up and suddenly decided to make a case with glass side panel and put a $300 price tag on it (909) does not put them in league with companies like NZXT, Corsair, Cooler Master who knows what they are actually doing.
  • dsraa - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    Ewww...what the hell is with that gross design on the non-windowed side??? What is that???
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    'artsy' vent holes for the topside mounted radiator you need to install to give this thing decent cooling.
  • jsntech - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    I've been using the In Win BUC since a few months after I read AT's review (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4303/inwin-buc-100-d... I've been a big fan of the BUC the whole time I've had it for my i5-2500K system.

    No plans to upgrade anytime soon, but this 303 looks like it'd be a great replacement. I especially like the decent sound dampening design.
  • Iketh - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    Here's an idea for case reviews. Add lines from the paragraph to the parts referred in the paragraph.
  • DCide - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    I usually use much smaller cases, so I'm not particularly interested in this one, but I really like the fact that it has 2 USB 3.0 plus 2 USB 2.0 ports on the front. The majority of motherboards have at least this many internal connectors, so it's a good idea.

    I wish more of the smaller cases would start to employ this arrangement.
  • jabber - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    Nah I'd get rid of the logo, the audio ports (well at least the mic socket) and just have two front USB3.0 ports.
  • DanNeely - Sunday, October 16, 2016 - link

    The front panel audio jacks need to support headphone+mic for wired gaming headsets. If they can do it with a combined port fine; if not the discrete mic port is still needed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now