Gaming Performance

World of Tanks enCore

Albeit different to most of the other commonly played MMO or massively multiplayer online games, World of Tanks is set in the mid-20th century and allows players to take control of a range of military based armored vehicles. World of Tanks (WoT) is developed and published by Wargaming who are based in Belarus, with the game’s soundtrack being primarily composed by Belarusian composer Sergey Khmelevsky. The game offers multiple entry points including a free-to-play element as well as allowing players to pay a fee to open up more features. One of the most interesting things about this tank based MMO is that it achieved eSports status when it debuted at the World Cyber Games back in 2012.

World of Tanks enCore is a demo application for a new and unreleased graphics engine penned by the Wargaming development team. Over time the new core engine will implemented into the full game upgrading the games visuals with key elements such as improved water, flora, shadows, lighting as well as other objects such as buildings. The World of Tanks enCore demo app not only offers up insight into the impending game engine changes, but allows users to check system performance to see if the new engine run optimally on their system.

GTX 980: World of Tanks enCore, Average FPSGTX 980: World of Tanks enCore, 95th Percentile

F1 2018

Aside from keeping up-to-date on the Formula One world, F1 2017 added HDR support, which F1 2018 has maintained; otherwise, we should see any newer versions of Codemasters' EGO engine find its way into F1. Graphically demanding in its own right, F1 2018 keeps a useful racing-type graphics workload in our benchmarks.

We use the in-game benchmark, set to run on the Montreal track in the wet, driving as Lewis Hamilton from last place on the grid. Data is taken over a one-lap race.

GTX 980: F1 2018, Average FPSGTX 980: F1 2018, 95th Percentile

CPU Performance, Short Form Corsair Hydro X Series Conclusion
Comments Locked

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • supdawgwtfd - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    Wanted. Native English speaker to read articles before posting...

    Seriously.... The absolutely terrible English in this a review is... Well. Terrible.

    Spelling mistakes. Repeating words. Disjointed sentences.

    Hire a fucking editor.
  • supdawgwtfd - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    Wanted. Native English speaker to read articles before posting...

    Seriously.... The absolutely terrible English in this a review is... Well. Terrible.

    Spelling mistakes. Repeating words. Disjointed sentences.

    Hire a fucking editor.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    They do correct typos and errors (sometimes) if you point them out in specific, but that depends on whether or not someone, either the writer or Ryan, skims through the comments.

    Yes, they need to do a lot better. It does say a lot that some of these glaring issues are actually published and some elbow grease is certainly warranted to make improvements on writing quality that has declined in recent years. I'd still give them a pass because coherent writing and skillful editing are dying arts thanks in no small part to autocorrection features and squggly red and green lines we now find in word processors.
  • Targon - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    Why would you use DDR4-3200CL18 RAM on ANY system? CL16 is bad enough, but CL18?
  • Ratman6161 - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    In "any system"? The answer is easy: To save money. But I agree that if you are buying a $700+ CPU and putting it on a $1000 motherboard and adding an $800+ cooling system, then skimping on the RAM would be foolish.

    For purposes of the test though, it doesn't matter since they were testing cooling performance.
  • Ratman6161 - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    OK, so I'm not so in to the custom loop thing. For me, this story confirms that I've made a good choice there. Here's why?

    The ID Cooling AIO they use as a comparison is a relatively low end unit. I couldn't find a price on it but I did find a review that said it wasn't as good as other similar AIO units and specifically cited the Corsair H100i as being superior. The H100i is $157 on Amazon.

    In spite of the relative crapiness of the ID cooling product, in the test it kept the overclocked 3950X down to 60C under load. That seems to me to be a darned good result. My overclocked 1700 peaks at about 65C under load using an H55 with push-pull fans and I consider that plenty good enough.

    So other than the cool/appearance factor, what is really to be gained from the custom loop given that I don't care about GPU cooling - Just CPU?

    What I was hoping to see was if they were able to get any more performance as a result of the lower temperatures. For example, at stock setting will the CPU boost higher or for longer or on more cores? Can you get a higher overclock out of it?
  • Tomatotech - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - link

    By using this, you gain a splatter of unicorn vomit all over your bedroom and a guarantee that you will never be crowded in your bed.
  • Daveteauk - Friday, February 7, 2020 - link

    WHAT?! You don't use Corsairs water blocks when you're doing a review of CORSAIRs water cooling system?! What a waste of everyone's time! That's the point I stopped reading! You should NOT have used that MoBo.
  • Daveteauk - Sunday, February 9, 2020 - link

    Why has someone removed my post which was complaining about your testing methods?! How can u do a test of CORSAIRs water cooling system and then NOT USE their accociated water blocks?!? = Total waste of everyone's time.
  • Korguz - Sunday, February 9, 2020 - link

    what are you talking about ?? your comment is still there

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now