Board Features

The Biostar Racing Z490GTN is a mini-ITX model designed to offer users an entry point to Z490 on a small form factor. Firmly set as one of the most budget models overall for Z490, the Z490GTN has a single PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slot with support for both NVMe and SATA drives, as well as four SATA ports with support for RAID 0, 1, 5, and 10. Due to the small size of the mini-ITX form factor, there is a single full-length PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, with just two memory slots with support for up to DDR4-4400 with a maximum capacity of up to 64 GB.

Biostar Racing Z490GTN ITX Motherboard
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link
Price $200
Size ITX
CPU Interface LGA1200
Chipset Intel Z490
Memory Slots (DDR4) Two DDR4
Supporting 64 GB
Dual-Channel
Up to DDR4-4400
Video Outputs 1 x HDMI
1 x D-Sub
Network Connectivity Intel I129-V GbE
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC892
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) 1 x PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) N/A
Onboard SATA Four, RAID 0/1/5/10 (Z490)
Onboard M.2 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4/SATA
USB 3.1 (20 Gbps) N/A
USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) N/A
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) 4 x USB Type-A (Rear panel)
2 x USB Type-A (One header)
USB 2.0 2 x USB Type-A (Rear panel)
2 x USB Type-A (One header)
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin Motherboard
1 x 8-pin CPU
Fan Headers 1 x 4-pin CPU
1 x 4-pin Water pump
1 x 4-pin Chassis
IO Panel 1 x PS/2 Mouse/Keyboard
1 x HDMI output
1 x D-Sub output
4 x USB 3.2 G1 Type-A
2 x USB 2.0 Type-A
1 x RJ45 (Intel)
3 x 3.5 mm audio jacks (Realtek)

There's a Realtek ALC892 HD audio codec with three 3.5 mm audio jacks on the rear panel, with a front panel audio header also present. For networking, there is a solitary Intel I219-V Gigabit Ethernet controller, with space for users to install their own wireless interface, with a Key-E M.2 slot and holes on the rear IO shield. The Biostar Racing Z490GTN doesn't set the world alight in terms of USB support, with no USB 3.2 Gen2 support whatsoever. The board does have four USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A and two USB 2.0 ports on the rear panel, with a single USB 3.2 G1 Type-A header offering two ports, and a single USB 2.0 ports which also offers two ports. Also on the rear panel is an HDMI and D-Sub pair of video outputs, as well as a PS/2 keyboard and mouse combo port.

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Test Setup
Processor Intel Core i7-10700K, 125 W, $374
8 Cores, 16 Threads 3.8 GHz (5.1 GHz Turbo)
Motherboard Biostar Racing Z490GTN (BIOS Z49AI522)
Cooling NZXT Kraken Z63 280 mm AIO
Power Supply Corsair HX850 850 W 80 PLUS Platinum
Memory G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-2933 CL 14-14-14-34 2T (2 x 8 GB)
Video Card MSI GTX 1080 (1178/1279 Boost)
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Case Corsair Crystal 680X
Operating System Windows 10 1909 inc. Spectre/Meltdown Patches

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Hardware Providers for CPU and Motherboard Reviews
Sapphire RX 460 Nitro MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X OC Crucial MX200 +
MX500 SSDs
Corsair AX860i +
AX1200i PSUs
G.Skill RipjawsV,
SniperX, FlareX
Crucial Ballistix
DDR4
Silverstone
Coolers
Silverstone
Fans

 

BIOS And Software System Performance
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    The only chipset on the market that needs active cooling is the AMD 570, because PCIe 4.0 is a power hog.
  • PeachNCream - Sunday, June 7, 2020 - link

    Absolutely it will be fine. The vast majority of reasonably designed motherboards need no active cooling anywhere. The few that add them do so because of PCIe 4.0 (currently only an AMD side thing) or fans are slapped onto VRMs to hide poor design decision under the guise of "overclocker friendly voltage regulator cooling enhancements" so people throw more money at supposedly higher margin parts while feeling like they are somehow obtaining greater value that justifies the expenditure. Classic marketing is still alive and well because, despite generations of exposure to it, we haven't gotten much smarter about identifying and coping with it.
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Thanks Gavin and Ian! Fully agree - way overpriced for what it has and can do.
    One suggestion, especially for boards that are likely to be used in an HTPC: please include the exact HDMI version supported (with specs) as well as any information on display port and Thunderbolt
    capabilities, including, of course, complete absence of such features. Thanks!

    As for the current state of affairs with Intel in the HTPC space: they are lucky that AMD has not made Renoir chips available for socketed mini-desktops, or they could kiss that market goodbye.
  • Slash3 - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Socketed Renoir is on the way.
  • lmcd - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    AM4 seems pretty big for ITX based on the ASRock board I have. This board might be bad but Intel should still have an upper hand, unless Comet Lake is bigger than past socket + chipset pairings?
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    has the same HSF hole spacing - so about the same size - it's only 49 additional pins
  • lmcd - Saturday, June 6, 2020 - link

    I meant the chipset.
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Unless I overlooked it, a review of AM4 mini ITX Boards would be interesting, if just for comparison. There are even a couple of x570 boards with PCIe 4.0 for about the price of this board here available, and they include Thunderbolt and WiFi connectivity, and a much better audio. However, my own preference would be for a cheaper B450 or 550 board for about half the price; that's enough for an HTPC setup.
  • Spunjji - Monday, June 8, 2020 - link

    How would a smaller socket+chipset give them the upper hand for HTPCs when Renoir offers better CPU performance for a given TDP and markedly superior graphics?

    AM4 might be "big for ITX", but that's irrelevant if you can still build an ITX system around it.
  • Operandi - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Looks like a pretty weak / inefficient VRM.

    Speaking of which if you are going to cover the VRM section of a board you need to go into more detail than simply stating the VRM configuration. 6+2 is almost meaningless when the quality of MOSFETS and drivers is what really determines how much power a board is capable of delivering and how efficient it will be. With the specs of the components involved and the layout along with some simple math is pretty easy to ballpark what a board is capable of.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now