CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

For B550 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1909 update.

Rendering - Blender 2.79b: 3D Creation Suite - link

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Rendering: Blender 2.79b

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing - link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Compression – WinRAR 5.60b3: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.60b3

Synthetic – 7-Zip v1805: link

Out of our compression/decompression tool tests, 7-zip is the most requested and comes with a built-in benchmark. For our test suite, we’ve pulled the latest version of the software and we run the benchmark from the command line, reporting the compression, decompression, and a combined score.

It is noted in this benchmark that the latest multi-die processors have very bi-modal performance between compression and decompression, performing well in one and badly in the other. There are also discussions around how the Windows Scheduler is implementing every thread. As we get more results, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Encoding: 7-Zip 1805 CompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 DecompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 Combined

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

System Performance Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

73 Comments

View All Comments

  • mode_13h - Monday, May 24, 2021 - link

    I can understand the sentiment of wanting 10G to take hold, so that prices will come down.

    Some of ASRock Rack's boards do have an option that includes a 10 Gigabit controller. I've had my eye on the X570D4U-2L2T, in fact.

    I think the reason this probably lacks 10 Gigabit is that they have two X570-based boards with 10 Gigabit (and one without). The point of the B550 board is to be lower-priced. So, if someone wants it, they can easily just step up to one of the X570s that has it.
  • spikebike - Tuesday, December 28, 2021 - link

    The article mentions a variant of the B550d4 with 2x10G.
  • fmyhr - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    Would many of this board's prospective users really use a GTX 980 and 1200W 75% PSU? Personally if I'm willing to spend that much electricity on a server, I'd go EPYC. The benefit of this board AFAICT is the ability to construct a true Ryzen server (i.e. ECC RAM and OoB management) that uses less power, and may cost less, than EPYC. Tradeoff is far less I/O bandwidth, and lower limit on CPU cores. Anyway, back to point: to lower power use with this you'd want to match power supply to actual requirement, something ~400W, preferably 90+ Gold or better efficiency, is probably a lot more appropriate.
  • Einy0 - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    Agreed, I'd much rather see power consumption numbers using just the BMC for video and an appropriately sized power supply.
  • dsplover - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    Excellent niche board, perfect for Pro Audio Workstation, as well as a 1U build.
    Just need the 5700G to get me to jump.

    Nice Review
  • hansmuff - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    "The only negative in performance came in our DPC latency testing, with our results showing that this board isn't suitable for DAW systems."
  • dsplover - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    DPC Latency is of no concern as I run an external DSP Audio/MIDI Interface.

    Been using ASRock Rack boards for years, even though they “bench” poorly.

    It’s the stability that counts for me. They are pricey but then so am I....
  • hansmuff - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    Fair enough!
  • edogawaconan - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    From the manufacturer's page:

    "For AMD Ryzen Desktop Processors with Radeon Graphics, ECC support is only with Processors with PRO technologies"

    Pretty sure this means only G series of Ryzen don't have ECC support.
  • fmyhr - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    As best I've been able to determine, Ryzen APUs do not support ECC unless they're of the "Pro" variety. Read somewhere this is because the iGPU must also support ECC, and most of them do not. Don't know why AMD makes this info so difficult to find out, OR why they've so far shipped Pro APUs only to OEMs, none to retail. It's like they don't WANT to compete with Xeon E3. </rant>

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now