Office Performance

The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Dolphin Benchmark: link

Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.

Dolphin Emulation Benchmark

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

The single module of the 7400K shows the deficit in a slightly threaded workload.

Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

For a purely single threaded test, both of the AMD APUs performed similarly here.

Web Benchmarks

On the lower end processors, general usability is a big factor of experience, especially as we move into the HTML5 era of web browsing.  For our web benchmarks, we take well known tests with Chrome 35 as a consistent browser.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Kraken 1.1

Google Octane v2

Google Octane v2

Professional Performance: Windows

We have a few benchmarks to characterise professional level performance on Windows.

Agisoft Photoscan – 2D to 3D Image Manipulation: link

Agisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Total Time

Cinebench R15

Cinebench is a benchmark based around Cinema 4D, and is fairly well known among enthusiasts for stressing the CPU for a provided workload. Results are given as a score, where higher is better.

Cinebench R15 - Single Threaded

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded

Linux Performance

Built around several freely available benchmarks for Linux, Linux-Bench is a project spearheaded by Patrick at ServeTheHome to streamline about a dozen of these tests in a single neat package run via a set of three commands using an Ubuntu 11.04 LiveCD. These tests include fluid dynamics used by NASA, ray-tracing, OpenSSL, molecular modeling, and a scalable data structure server for web deployments. We run Linux-Bench and have chosen to report a select few of the tests that rely on CPU and DRAM speed.

C-Ray: link

C-Ray is a simple ray-tracing program that focuses almost exclusively on processor performance rather than DRAM access. The test in Linux-Bench renders a heavy complex scene offering a large scalable scenario.

Linux-Bench c-ray 1.1 (Hard)

NAMD, Scalable Molecular Dynamics: link

Developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, NAMD is a set of parallel molecular dynamics codes for extreme parallelization up to and beyond 200,000 cores. The reference paper detailing NAMD has over 4000 citations, and our testing runs a small simulation where the calculation steps per unit time is the output vector.

Linux-Bench NAMD Molecular Dynamics

NPB, Fluid Dynamics: link

Aside from LINPACK, there are many other ways to benchmark supercomputers in terms of how effective they are for various types of mathematical processes. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) are a set of small programs originally designed for NASA to test their supercomputers in terms of fluid dynamics simulations, useful for airflow reactions and design.

Linux-Bench NPB Fluid Dynamics

AMD A10-7700K and AMD A6-7400K Mini-Review Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

105 Comments

View All Comments

  • akamateau - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    Hey silverblow who are you the comment NAZI? LOL

    Is the best you got, whining because I made three posts?

    What IDIOT except you would believe that ANYONE is a paid shill. What a marroon! What are you a Paid Shill for AnandHACK.

    I detest lying media hacks who distort or hide the facts.

    As a consumer I demand the know the facts and if I have to challenge gutless lying writers then I will. Whenever and however I damm well please.
  • silverblue - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    I'd love for you to meet chizow.
  • D. Lister - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    Such a collision would probably rip a hole in spacetime. :p
  • akamateau - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    @Ian Cutress

    Why no DX12 benchmarks?

    You have Starwswarm.

    You have 3dMark API OVERHEAD BENCHMARK.

    Why didn't you use them?

    No GUTS? Afraid to answer? How much money did Intel pay you to ignore DX12 Benchmarks?

    You call yourself a journalist?

    These AMD releases are all intended for Windows 10 and DX12 products and you lie about their performance.

    You are pathetic.
  • akamateau - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    If you upgrade to Windows 10 then your build will be pretty dam good. In fact it will be a far better gaming rig than ANY Intel i3, i5 or i7.
  • piasabird - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    I have a computer at home with the i3 4330 In the chart it says it costs $138 which is probably the current retail price. However, I bought mine about 1.5 years ago for about $124.95 when it was on sale from Newegg. You can often find some good deals around X-Mass or New Years. He who waits, saves.
  • jardows2 - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    For those who are hating on Ian for reviewing older products, not a product to be release tomorrow, and not using BETA or Pre-ALPHA software in review, you are ignorant at best. Here is information for anyone who might be influenced by your baseless rhetoric:

    1. NDA's. The reviewers can only publish reviews when the manufacturer allows them to
    2. Review Samples: The reviewers can only publish reviews on products they actually have in hand. A product that hasn't been released yet cant' get into their hands unless the manufacturer sends them a pre-sample. In that case, see point 1 above.
    3. Time to review. Did you not notice this was a "Mini-Review" and not an in-depth review? It takes time to do a proper review, write it up, and publish it.
    4. Bench. Anandtech writers will put their results in a database we can search and quickly find results and compare to other products. It is nonsensical for the reviewers to run every test you want, or to continue to use benchmarks that are irrelevant.
  • Edens_Remorse - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    Influenced by baseless rhetoric? How about we save people from being influenced from this lousy "mini-review." From the incorrect price listings to the nonsensical approach to "reviewing" this product, everything here reeks of bias - well, that or just stupidity and incompetence. Too many helpful reviews of this product line elsewhere to accept this bullsh*t. Eteknix is a great place to look if you choose not to believe me.
  • devione - Friday, May 29, 2015 - link

    I'm sorry that in your world everyone else besides yourseld are apparently misinformed ignorant idiots that need to be told what to do and how to think.

    Thank God for the thought police like yourself. Heavens know where we'd be without such awesome heroes like yourself. You have my kudos and approval.
  • Edens_Remorse - Friday, May 29, 2015 - link

    Ironic. I provide an alternative assesment of the reviewed product based on facts from multiple sources that i have shared here for all to see. I have corrected blatent errors(price/performance) and confronted an agenda, yet i am the thought police. Hehe, ok.

    Sorry bud, this mini review doesn't do the product line justice. Misinformation sucks...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now