Office Performance

The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Dolphin Benchmark: link

Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.

Dolphin Emulation Benchmark

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

The single module of the 7400K shows the deficit in a slightly threaded workload.

Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

For a purely single threaded test, both of the AMD APUs performed similarly here.

Web Benchmarks

On the lower end processors, general usability is a big factor of experience, especially as we move into the HTML5 era of web browsing.  For our web benchmarks, we take well known tests with Chrome 35 as a consistent browser.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Kraken 1.1

Google Octane v2

Google Octane v2

Professional Performance: Windows

We have a few benchmarks to characterise professional level performance on Windows.

Agisoft Photoscan – 2D to 3D Image Manipulation: link

Agisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Total Time

Cinebench R15

Cinebench is a benchmark based around Cinema 4D, and is fairly well known among enthusiasts for stressing the CPU for a provided workload. Results are given as a score, where higher is better.

Cinebench R15 - Single Threaded

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded

Linux Performance

Built around several freely available benchmarks for Linux, Linux-Bench is a project spearheaded by Patrick at ServeTheHome to streamline about a dozen of these tests in a single neat package run via a set of three commands using an Ubuntu 11.04 LiveCD. These tests include fluid dynamics used by NASA, ray-tracing, OpenSSL, molecular modeling, and a scalable data structure server for web deployments. We run Linux-Bench and have chosen to report a select few of the tests that rely on CPU and DRAM speed.

C-Ray: link

C-Ray is a simple ray-tracing program that focuses almost exclusively on processor performance rather than DRAM access. The test in Linux-Bench renders a heavy complex scene offering a large scalable scenario.

Linux-Bench c-ray 1.1 (Hard)

NAMD, Scalable Molecular Dynamics: link

Developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, NAMD is a set of parallel molecular dynamics codes for extreme parallelization up to and beyond 200,000 cores. The reference paper detailing NAMD has over 4000 citations, and our testing runs a small simulation where the calculation steps per unit time is the output vector.

Linux-Bench NAMD Molecular Dynamics

NPB, Fluid Dynamics: link

Aside from LINPACK, there are many other ways to benchmark supercomputers in terms of how effective they are for various types of mathematical processes. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) are a set of small programs originally designed for NASA to test their supercomputers in terms of fluid dynamics simulations, useful for airflow reactions and design.

Linux-Bench NPB Fluid Dynamics

AMD A10-7700K and AMD A6-7400K Mini-Review Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

105 Comments

View All Comments

  • Edens_Remorse - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    Indeed - with dx12 that 860k/870k is going to look a lot more competitive against i5s too. One of my favorite CPUs out right now.
  • nissangtr786 - Sunday, May 31, 2015 - link

    Why i5 haswell cpus generally are 80-90% faster then 860k in integer performance and 4x FPU performance. These benchmarks with r9 285 shows the i5 4690 getting double fps then an a10-7850k with r9 285 in Grid Autosport. 860k is in between a pentium and an i3. i3 haswell destroy 860k at gaming due to 4th ALU meaning its gonna beat cpus like fx9590 in most multithreaded games.
  • akamateau - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    Hey Ian Cutress, where are the DX12 3dMArk API Overhead Tests? Where are the Starw Swarm Tests?

    Are you afraid that AMD will crush Intel? Are you an Intel scamwriter?

    Where are the DX12 API Overhead Benchmarks? Where are the Starswarm Benchmarks?
  • akamateau - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    @ Ian "The Hack" Cutress

    Who cares about obsolete gaming benchmarks. Where are the DX12 3dMArk and Starswarm benchmarks.

    Are you afraid that AMD A10 APU's CRUSHES INTEL IGP?

    MORE SHYTE SCIENCE FROM ANANDHACK.
  • akamateau - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    Ian Cutress I dare you to run 3dMArk API Overhead Benchmark and Starswarm.

    Do you have the GUTS to tell the truth or do you just lie to your readers?

    DX11 is dead. Drive a stake through it.

    DX12 will allow AMD to CRUSH Intel products.
  • silverblue - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    For somebody who doesn't appear to like the site, or Ian Cutress for that matter, you do post the same criticisms multiple times albeit with small changes. Keep it to one post, drop the caps and drop the attitude - DirectX 12 is not finished yet, so screaming foul play isn't going to get you anywhere.

    In fact, you're so intent on gushing praise for AMD that I'm surprised you've not been accused of being either a troll or a paid shill by now.
  • Edens_Remorse - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    I'm not a paid shill or troll - that said I think it's a joke that this review comes a day before Godavari's release. I really should find a better word to use, "review" is a little too generous. And by a little too generous I actually mean - what an effn joke.
  • akamateau - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    I agree with your assessment.

    These new AMD releases are intended for Winodws 10 and DX12 devices. Cutress has 3dMark API Overhead and Starswarm benchmarks but he refuses to use them as they show ALL Intel IGP performing at 50% less than AMD APU's.

    If you want to buid a great gaming machine and not pay a lot then buy AMD APU's. These new A10's will rock they 100% better than Haswell.

    Cutress knows this but Intel paid him to hide this from his readers.
  • akamateau - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    Who are you the comment NAZI? LOL

    Is the best you got, whining because I made three posts?

    What IDIOT except you would believe that ANYONE is a paid shill. What a marroon! What are you a Paid Shill for AnandHACK.

    I detest lying media hacks who distort or hide the facts.

    As a consumer I demand the know the facts and if I have to challenge gutless lying writers then I will. Whenever and however I damm well please.
  • silverblue - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link

    I'm a fetching dark shade of crimson? Well, I've been called worse. The point still stands, however - one post would've done it, and without half the rage that went into your previous submissions.

    Paid shill? I can only dream.

    Edens_Remorse - this is a "mini" review that Ian promised (a few days ago, I might add) to publish. The clue may not be in the URL (unfortunately), but it is in the article title. I wouldn't expect much from a mini-review.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now