CPU Performance: New Tests!

As part of our ever on-going march towards a better rounded view of the performance of these processors, we have a few new tests for you that we’ve been cooking in the lab. Some of these new benchmarks provide obvious talking points, others are just a bit of fun. Most of them are so new we’ve only run them on a few processors so far. It will be interesting to hear your feedback!

NAMD ApoA1

One frequent request over the years has been for some form of molecular dynamics simulation. Molecular dynamics forms the basis of a lot of computational biology and chemistry when modeling specific molecules, enabling researchers to find low energy configurations or potential active binding sites, especially when looking at larger proteins. We’re using the NAMD software here, or Nanoscale Molecular Dynamics, often cited for its parallel efficiency. Unfortunately the version we’re using is limited to 64 threads on Windows, but we can still use it to analyze our processors. We’re simulating the ApoA1 protein for 10 minutes, and reporting back the ‘nanoseconds per day’ that our processor can simulate. Molecular dynamics is so complex that yes, you can spend a day simply calculating a nanosecond of molecular movement.

NAMD 2.31 Molecular Dynamics (ApoA1)

 

Crysis CPU Render

One of the most oft used memes in computer gaming is ‘Can It Run Crysis?’. The original 2007 game, built in the Crytek engine by Crytek, was heralded as a computationally complex title for the hardware at the time and several years after, suggesting that a user needed graphics hardware from the future in order to run it. Fast forward over a decade, and the game runs fairly easily on modern GPUs, but we can also apply the same concept to pure CPU rendering – can the CPU render Crysis? Since 64 core processors entered the market, one can dream. We built a benchmark to see whether the hardware can.

For this test, we’re running Crysis’ own GPU benchmark, but in CPU render mode. This is a 2000 frame test, which we run over a series of resolutions from 800x600 up to 1920x1080.

Crysis CPU Render
Frames Per Second
AnandTech 800
x600
1024
x768
1280
x800
1366
x768
1600
x900
1920
x1080
AMD
Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.50 8.75 7.44 6.83 5.21 4.30
Ryzen 5 3600 9.98 7.84 6.69 6.15 4.75 3.92
Ryzen 3 3300X 8.42 6.52 5.43 5.01 3.92 3.07
Ryzen 3 3100 7.50 5.78 4.87 4.5 3.54 2.77
Intel
Core i7-7700K 7.63 5.87 4.95 4.55 3.57 2.79
Core i7-9750H 6.78 5.17 4.37 3.99 3.12 2.46

 

Dwarf Fortress

Another long standing request for our benchmark suite has been Dwarf Fortress, a popular management/roguelike indie video game, first launched in 2006. Emulating the ASCII interfaces of old, this title is a rather complex beast, which can generate environments subject to millennia of rule, famous faces, peasants, and key historical figures and events. The further you get into the game, depending on the size of the world, the slower it becomes.

DFMark is a benchmark built by vorsgren on the Bay12Forums that gives two different modes built on DFHack: world generation and embark. These tests can be configured, but range anywhere from 3 minutes to several hours. I’ve barely scratched the surface here, but after analyzing the test, we ended up going for three different world generation sizes.

Dwarf Fortress (Small) 65x65 World, 250 YearsDwarf Fortress (Medium) 125x125 World, 250 YearsDwarf Fortress (Big) 257x257 World, 550 Years

Interestingly Intel's hardware likes Dwarf Fortress.

 

We also have other benchmarks in the wings, such as AI Benchmark (ETH), LINPACK, and V-Ray, however they still require a bit of tweaking to get working it seems.

Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance: System Tests
Comments Locked

249 Comments

View All Comments

  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    You just called them AMD shills. They went into this review to prove how great AMD is, that is not journalism, that is not a review, that is a marketing campaign.

    Literally zero need to use the CPU bench tool they have, literally every other site I've checked has a useful, much better review, although it doesn't hit the level of marketing you are looking for.
  • Spunjji - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    "Openly stating the obvious conclusion that your empirical testing led you to is a marketing caompaign" is exactly the sort of anti-intellectual, brain-dead take I have come to expect from you, Ben.

    He didn't call them AMD shills - you did, and all for daring to have an opinion.
  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 15, 2020 - link

    "They try to make a point with their review"

    That is to the letter the opposite of objectivity, that is precisely what shilling is, and I'm not the one that said it. Is English not your first language? You truly shouldn't being up intellect if you don't comprehend the words being used.
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    is it any different that the AMD Fluff like "Which is the best CPU" "Which is the best Workstation CPU" etc ...
  • Spunjji - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    How was that article "AMD fluff"?

    Oh, because Intel's offerings got panned. How sad. I guess that means Anandtech has a bias that tracks roughly with which parts are the best at any given time. Its almost like... objectivity 🤔
  • PeterCollier - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    I agree. Ian should take some classes from Andrei on chart creation and proper benchmarking.
  • Fataliity - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    The first page talks about,

    Which should you buy? the 3100/3300 versiohns, or a 2600, or a 1600AF?
    And then the benchmarks compare them.

    He's comparing what you can buy in the price range, I thought it was easy to understand.
  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    The world does not revolve around what amdownzjoo.com has as a recommended processor. Even if we were limiting ourselves to that, what about the 3200G? Every other site I found handled their reviews of this product much better.
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, May 13, 2020 - link

    What *about* the 3200G? It's an older, slower CPU. If you're going to add a dGPU, it's pointless. If you're not, you're still better off waiting for the 4000 series.

    The desperate scraping for even a semblance of a point in your posts is positively painful.
  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 15, 2020 - link

    Wanting to see how a $99 CPU compares to a $99 and a $129 CPU is pointless..... You have a special way of viewing things.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now