System Performance: UL and BAPCo Benchmarks

Our 2022 test suite for Windows 11-based systems carries over some of the standard benchmarks we have been using over the last several years, including UL's PCMark and BAPCo's SYSmark. Starting this year, we are also including BAPCo's CrossMark multi-platform benchmarking tool.

PCMark 10

UL's PCMark 10 evaluates computing systems for various usage scenarios (generic / essential tasks such as web browsing and starting up applications, productivity tasks such as editing spreadsheets and documents, gaming, and digital content creation). We benchmarked select PCs with the PCMark 10 Extended profile and recorded the scores for various scenarios. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU and GPU in the system, though the RAM and storage device also play a part. The power plan was set to Balanced for all the PCs while processing the PCMark 10 benchmark.

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Essentials

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Productivity

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Gaming

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Digital Content Creation

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Extended

The Essentials and Gaming workloads see the NUC BOX-1260P come out on top with a narrow lead. However, the Productivity and Digital Content Creation workloads both heavily favor multi-threaded processors. The larger number of high-performance cores enable the 4X4 BOX-5800U to gain an healthy edge. Overall, we see the two Cezanne configurations occupy the top two spots in the PCMark 10 leaderboard.

BAPCo SYSmark 25

BAPCo's SYSmark 25 is an application-based benchmark that uses real-world applications to replay usage patterns of business users in the areas of productivity, creativity, and responsiveness. The 'Productivity Scenario' covers office-centric activities including word processing, spreadsheet usage, financial analysis, software development, application installation, file compression, and e-mail management. The 'Creativity Scenario' represents media-centric activities such as digital photo processing, AI and ML for face recognition in photos and videos for the purpose of content creation, etc. The 'Responsiveness Scenario' evaluates the ability of the system to react in a quick manner to user inputs in areas such as application and file launches, web browsing, and multi-tasking.

Scores are meant to be compared against a reference desktop (the SYSmark 25 calibration system, a Lenovo Thinkcenter M720q with a Core i5-8500T and 8GB of DDR4 memory to go with a 256GB M.2 NVMe SSD). The calibration system scores 1000 in each of the scenarios. A score of, say, 2000, would imply that the system under test is twice as fast as the reference system.

SYSmark 25 - Productivity

SYSmark 25 - Creativity

SYSmark 25 - Responsiveness

SYSmark 25 - Overall

SYSmark 25 also adds energy measurement to the mix. A high score in the SYSmark benchmarks might be nice to have, but potential customers also need to determine the balance between power consumption and the performance of the system. For example, in the average office scenario, it might not be worth purchasing a noisy and power-hungry PC just because it ends up with a 2000 score in the SYSmark 25 benchmarks. In order to provide a balanced perspective, SYSmark 25 also allows vendors and decision makers to track the energy consumption during each workload. In the graphs below, we find the total energy consumed by the PC under test for a single iteration of each SYSmark 25 workload. For reference, the calibration system consumes 8.88 Wh for productivity, 10.81 Wh for creativity, and 19.69 Wh overall.

SYSmark 25 - Productivity Energy Consumption

SYSmark 25 - Creativity Energy Consumption

SYSmark 25 - Overall Energy Consumption

Though the NUC BOX-1260P gets high scores in all segments, the energy consumption is quite high. In fact, at 33.78 Wh overall, it is the worst performer by a significant margin (44.1 / Wh). On the other hand, the Cezanne system in performance mode delivers a score of 54.5 / Wh, and the normal mode delivers a score of 50.9 / Wh. The Cezanne system delivers better performance per Joule in SYSmark 25.

BAPCo CrossMark 1.0.1.86

BAPCo's CrossMark aims to simplify benchmark processing while still delivering scores that roughly tally with SYSmark. The main advantage is the cross-platform nature of the tool - allowing it to be run on smartphones and tablets as well.

CrossMark 1.0.1.86 - Productivity

CrossMark 1.0.1.86 - Creativity

CrossMark 1.0.1.86 - Responsiveness

CrossMark 1.0.1.86 - Overall

The relative performance seen in SYSmark 25 translate to CrossMark also, as expected. The NUC BOX-1260P comes out on top comfortably, and the Cezanne system is right behind.

Setup Notes and Platform Analysis System Performance: Miscellaneous Workloads
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Saturday, August 6, 2022 - link

    Interesting compute platforms. Its a pity they had to name the AMD variant "4X4" which would feel pretty terrible in terms of putting one on a desk thanks to all the negative connotations surrounding vehicles and their owners that have similar brand identifiers. Its going to inhibit AMD sales in the US significantly because of how few people want to be associated with that part of our subculture, especially now that things are so polarized. Nothing like setting AMD up for failure by people outside the nation that just don't understand the meaning behind appealing to that one sub-group which, thankfully, does not represent everyone in the US even if it is a loud and visible portion of the population.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, August 9, 2022 - link

    Tell me you chug soy without telling me you chug soy.
  • SkipPerk - Wednesday, August 31, 2022 - link

    I love East Asian English. I lived in Taiwan early in my career, and I think I prefer their English (and adore their innocent love of Americana). My Taiwanese first wife is long gone, but I sincerely hope my current wife (from Thailand) retains that eager, wholesome English with an easy-to-love accent.
  • domih - Saturday, August 6, 2022 - link

    Thanks for the review!

    ASRock 4x4 4800U owner here.

    The box is indeed small and looks good. However, it heats pretty quickly when loaded and the blower fan is not silent :-( I guess it should be better with a 5000 series, not sure though.
  • rexnyc - Monday, August 8, 2022 - link

    Thanks for the in depth review. Is it possible to enable XMP on either of these?
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, August 9, 2022 - link

    Really disappointing that once again OEMs are screwing AMD by using USB 2.0 on the rar of the AMD box and 3.2 on the intel box.
  • Oxford Guy - Sunday, August 21, 2022 - link

    USB 2 has no place on any new equipment in 2022.
  • SkipPerk - Wednesday, August 31, 2022 - link

    Does anyone know why AMD boards are getting shipped with USB2? I always use these for peripherals.
  • sjkpublic@gmail.com - Wednesday, August 10, 2022 - link

    I can attest to the ASROCK 4x4 4800U - nice NUC. ASROCK support is fantastic. The AMD version has great connectivity. For the 5800U would like 128GB mem instead of 64GB. Fan noise may be an issue. And video rather weak. However I am saving over $200 year on electricity. ASROCK makes great NUCs.
  • Dug - Friday, August 12, 2022 - link

    Would be nice if manufacturers would start releasing 6800u variants from AMD.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now